Back2sq1: August 2004
You have probably been wondering what connection there is
between great crested newts and the ever-growing threat to the
British way of life. How have coypu infiltrated every level of
government, and what is the real reason that speed cameras are
breeding at such an alarming rate? Is global warming really
caused by breathing? Can the answer to life, the universe and
everything be found in children's stories, and does poetry
have a role to play? Who is Henry (Fred) "Shrimp"
Houseago, and does it matter? The answers to almost all of
these vital questions will occasionally be found here.
This page is currently filtered on: August
2004 [Remove
filter]
This feed is available in the following formats:
Atom 1.0 |
RSS 2.0
on 27 August 2004 at 16:42
Signs of a far different culture
I took a last chance to holiday in America this month, before
it becomes not worth the effort to break through the
bureaucracy barrier at the border. And my trip to New England
held a few surprises. Not just the kind you get when you walk
on the pavement (hit by truck) or say you are staying for a
fortnight (total incomprehension). Nor the even more
mysterious linguistic conundrums that leave you wondering
what on earth, for instance, “native ice cubes” might be.
No, the big surprise was the trees. Of course even I had
heard that autumn in New England is spectacularly bright
because of the gloriously technicoloured leaves heading for a
fall, but I was unprepared for quite how many trees there
are. Even the 4000-foot mountains of New Hampshire and
Vermont are completely covered by them, so that the only view
a climber can hope to get is at the top.
Don’t get me wrong – I love trees, and I loved New England,
but there were times when I yearned for the majestic
bleakness of a Scottish Munro.
The other big surprise came on the stunning shoreline of
Maine and Massachusetts, where I made a few fruitless forays
down side roads before I realised that the vast majority of
it was privately owned. In the land of the free, beauty has a
price. We should be grateful that much of our own compelling
coast is open to anyone.
But because I spent so much time travelling, what really made
an impact on me was the road signs, some of which I would
like to see introduced into Norfolk. “Watch for moose in
roadway”, for instance.
Then there was the brutal frankness of “Wrong way”, which
sounds a lot more helpful than it is. Perhaps Norfolk County
Council could use it to replace the much less useful
“Byroad”.
More in the Norfolk style was the mid-highway “Bump”, which
made you wonder why they didn’t spend the sign money on
smoothing the road.
I enjoyed “Thickly settled”, which I took to be like
Brundall, and the pretty well essential “Bridge freezes
before road” – for some reason quite common in Vermont, where
people freeze before bridges.
I can think of a number of prominent Norfolk citizens who
would appreciate “Give way to Rotary traffic”, though they
might be bemused by the healthy “Reduced salt area”.
But perhaps my favourite was the reassuring “No tolls ahead”.
I don’t know why this should be especially noteworthy. There
were no elephants either. Moose, of course, are another
matter.
Ways to keep traffic flowing
What a joy to drive hundreds of miles through Ontario,
Quebec, New York State and New England without seeing a
single speed camera or road hump.
Ontario, of course, abandoned its cameras after finding they
did not reduce road deaths, as indeed they haven’t in this
country. And for some reason putting obstacles in the middle
of the road has never caught on across the Atlantic.
Two things common in most areas, though, are worth
introducing here. One is the ability to overtake on both
sides, which might help avert the frustration caused by slow
drivers religiously avoiding the inside lane.
It will do nothing, unfortunately, to avoid the real plague
of driving in the United Kingdom, which is selfish lorry
drivers overtaking other lorries painfully slowly on dual
carriageways – clots causing clots, as it were.
The other innovation across the Atlantic is the simple
proviso that, after stopping, you can turn right on a red
light if the road is clear. Don’t panic; that would be left
in this country, and it would also be a safe, cheap and easy
way to keep traffic flowing.
So no chance of that happening.
Making exploration much easier
I am delighted to be able to report another breakthrough by
intrepid Norfolk explorer Richard “Volcano” Meek, who has
discovered why most people have trouble finding the source of
rivers.
He writes: “Most explorers seem, somewhat perversely in my
view, to spend a lot of time and trouble looking for the thin
end of rivers – the bits where they are little more than a
damp spot in a field of mangolds. “It should be obvious to
all that the easiest bit to find is the thick end, which is
bigger, wetter and usually marked on a map. I set out about
two weeks ago and followed a well-marked trail along the
banks of the River Nar from Gressenhall to King’s Lynn.
“Lo and behold, there was the mouth of the river – stuck on
the side of the Ouse, just as the helpful notes supplied by
the Setchey and Upper Wormegay Tourist Board said that it
would be!
“May I commend this method to other would-be explorers as a
far more productive and reliable way to actually find
something after all that hard work?”
We are all grateful to Mr Meek for his ground-breaking
excavations in so many areas; so it was sad to hear that he
was confined to hospital for a few days after his latest
adventure. He attributes his recovery to “the Angels of
Necton Ward”, an organisation so obscure that I have not
managed to uncover anything about it, except that it is
probably underpaid.
Impediments up for abolition
While I was away, I see that a reader suggested to the editor
that when speed cameras are abolished I might turn my
attention to the removal of “other irritating impediments to
the motorist”, like traffic lights, keep-left signs and zebra
crossings.
These are interesting ideas. Keep-left signs would often be
unnecessary if the obstruction put up to support the sign was
removed, and zebra crossings would be redundant if motorists
had the respect for pedestrians that they should have: some
countries make do with simpler indications of pedestrian
priority. Unfortunately many Britons seem to collect a rather
pathetic aura of superiority every time they get in a car,
much as they do when they drink a can of beer, so I could not
support abolition of zebras.
Traffic lights are a moot point. They often keep you waiting
unnecessarily and thus cause frustration. I seem to remember
that a former Transport Secretary said that traffic lights
caused most of the delays in London (that was before Ken
Livingstone, of course).
He may have been joking. I personally would love to see the
idiotic lights on the Trowse bypass replaced by a roundabout,
but it is probably too late for that, as it is for so many
things.
on 9 August 2004 at 04:30
Unhelpful, but is it true?
George Orwell may not have quite hit the target with his
predictions for 1984, but he would certainly have no
difficulty recognising the attempts to manipulate society 20
years on through the misuse of statistics, “expert” analysis
and half-truths.
Use of the word “unhelpful” is often a key clue that this may
be going on. The first question we used to ask was whether
something was true or not. Now this does not seem to be so
important; we ask instead whether it serves to push people in
a certain direction.
So when a few weeks back a study warned that fruit and
vegetables are now less nutritious than they used to be, this
was denounced as not wrong but “unhelpful…because we are
trying to get people to eat more fruit and vegetables”. When
Colin Powell went to the United Nations to try to persuade
them to approve war in Iraq, Picasso’s anti-war picture,
Guernica, was covered up, no doubt because it was unhelpful.
The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to
Children is against parents smacking their children because
it is unhelpful for professional child care workers – quite
astonishing arrogance.
And now a Norwich headmaster is attacked because he had the
nerve to point out, quite accurately in many people’s view,
that a lot of university courses were lightweight.
This was “deeply unhelpful”, he was told by Jonathan
Whitehead, of the Association of University Teachers – not
because it was not true, but because “lots of academics are
working hard to encourage people to go to university”.
I wonder why they are doing that. Sorry, that’s extremely
unhelpful. Clearly, we mustn’t discuss it.
MP in custard is good food policy
Our dictatorial government likes nothing better than to tell
us what to say, do and think.
And schools – as if they don’t have enough to do – now have
to make sure they are turning out thousands of little
Identikit kiddies who all do, say and think the right things.
Schools have a policy on almost everything. It is not their
idea: they have to. Like almost every part of institutional
or business life, they are drowning in a sea of rules and
regulations.
A financial manager told me recently that he employed people
from Eastern Europe who had fled Communism to escape from the
ever-present rule-book without which they could do nothing.
And – you’ve guessed it – it’s now even worse here.
Not long ago Labour MP David Kidney said in the House that
“every school should have a food policy” covering not just
school meals but the content of children’s lunch boxes. He
wanted to “embed good attitudes to food”.
In my view a good attitude to food would be tipping Mr Kidney
into some custard, and I am sure many head teachers would
back such an idea.
In a similar spirit and as part of a national scheme, Norfolk
is providing some schools with free fruit for children next
term. Let’s hope we don’t get to the stage reached in another
county where teachers speak of the specially bred School
Fruit Tree, which produces distinctively soft, tasteless
apples.
Bumping along in a bouncy way
If speed humps are the answer, we are asking the wrong
question. But sadly, it doesn’t matter how ludicrous a
proposition is; if enough people get behind it, it will
gradually become accepted.
In this case, a conglomeration of power-hungry parish
councillors, bad drivers, joyless individuals and,
presumably, hump-makers have got behind the crazy idea of
putting obstructions in the road to make them safer, to such
an extent that the authorities have abandoned all
responsibility and complied in a particularly mindless way.
I don’t intend to go again into the reasons why humps are
such a ridiculous idea. If you can’t see it, you can’t see
it. But when I am told by everyone I meet that they are
hated, and that they are so bad in some areas that parents
“have to use a 4x4 to get to the nursery”, it must be time to
think again. If the policy-light Tories want an issue on
which to sweep back to power, I suggest that roads and
transport is it.
But is it too late? My small grandson, without the slightest
prompting by anyone, pushes his toy buggy along the pavement
and periodically bounces it over imaginary bumps. Sadly, he
may never find out what proper streets were like.
Better treatment of humans demanded
A newly formed branch of BETH (Birds for the Ethical
Treatment of Humans) is planning a number of demonstrations
in Norfolk in a bid to prevent exploitation of humans by
animals of all kinds.
One of the organisers, who wanted to be known simply as the
Pondhenge Goose, said: “It is shocking the way some animals
exploit humans for their own selfish purposes. Crocodiles,
for instance.
“But nearer home, cats and dogs shamelessly demand constant
attention, feeding, pampering and in some cases totally
disrupting their owners’ holidays.
“I was told only yesterday of the appalling case of a woman
who had to come home three days early from the South of
France because she was concerned about her dogs.”
The Goose claimed that thousands of innocent humans were
forced to sleep in the same rooms as their pets, and some
particularly demanding canines had been seen pulling their
owners along on what could only be described as leads, while
at the same time fouling up the pathways that children had to
walk along.
“If something isn’t done soon, they will take over,” the bird
warned.
Not grasping the fundamentals, part 53
When it comes down to it, the real cause of most accidents is
bad driving – but maybe it’s bad teaching too. I came across
a gentleman the other day who passed his test some time ago
but has not quite grasped one or two basic points. He still
thinks, for instance, that putting his vehicle in a high gear
will enable him to pull away from a junction more quickly.
Given that pulling away from junctions is one of the most
dangerous moments on the road, you might think that someone
would have felt the need to put him right.